Illogical Paradox

You know, I’m just SO glad that the Jewish world’s ideological opponents are so peaceful, tolerant, and LEGAL when expressing their opinions. That really makes it a lot easier to come to a consensus about Israel’s place in the world, and that of its Arab neighbors.

And also, I think that when fighting for your beliefs, you should give your group a peaceful and persuasive title such as “Terrorist Crew” and call yourself something inspiring such as “Muslim Defacer”. Furthermore, you should strive to make your statement in the most obnoxious, immature, illegal, and generally NASTY way. That really gets results.

Loading image

Click anywhere to cancel

The latest issue of Time magazine exemplifies the exact sort of idiocy that would have my AP Statistics teacher coughing up hairballs - they confuse correlation with causation.

The article at blame is titled “Why Girls Need Gym Class: Physical fitness has tangible effects on classroom performance, says a new study”. However, despite the author’s assumably confident interpretation, the study says nothing of the sort.

The study says that, out of a few thousand students surveyed, girls who got a significant amount of physical education each week scored significantly higher on standarized tests. However, the study never mentions any kind of controlled experiment that would lead one to conclude that the physical education CAUSES the higher test scores. It just states that a correlation has been found.

Curiously, boys’ test scores are apparently unaffected by gym class, assumably because they get more exercise outside of school than girls do. However…this is simply not true anymore. The students surveyed in the study were all elementary school, and it seems to me that elementary school is when both genders get precisely the SAME amount of exercise–it is only in later grades that boys get into school sports (many of which girls don’t participate in, such as football and wrestling), and girls get into doing their hair and watching cute boys play football and wrestle.

But besides this strange anomaly, the main point I want to make is this: hasn’t it occured to anyone that perhaps there’s a different reason for physical education to be linked with standarized test performance?

For instance, students at such a young age are very susceptible to how they are being educated. I’m in high school and I can educate myself - I read books and magazines, look up stuff online, talk to adults who (hopefully) know what they’re talking about, analyze things and write blog posts, etc. Younger kids, however, usually only learn what they’re taught at school. The sort of school system that offers its students gym class is likely to be more financially endowed, more respectable, BETTER than a school system that doesn’t. A better school, in the elementary grades especially, may often translate to better test scores.

And that’s just one example.

Another thing to note is that the article doesn’t mention if these kids are public school students only, or if private and parochial schools are included. That makes a difference.

And, finally, the study was carried out by the Centers for Disease Control. You’d think they’d WANT to promote exercise anyway.

The article concludes with a typical bashing of No Child Left Behind (not that I disagree with it on this), and states, “…most kids have gym class only once or twice a week. That lack of physical exercise could be adversely affecting girls’ academic development.”

Well. At least they used the word “could”.

So I can have my wordpress blog back after all.

My last one was deleted in an extremely cruel manner by my hoster, claiming that I had not posted sufficiently on the stupid forum…well, excuse ME if I was busy with that little something called…oh yeah, being an honors student in her junior year of high school. That means I get to do things like:

• SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test)
• ACT (American College Test)
• AP (Advanced Placement)
• NHS (National Honor Society)
• BS (I think you can figure out what that one stands for)

Basically, posting on a stupid forum trying to talk about current events and why Bush is a jackass and why Angelina Jolie needs to stop adopting third-world children is just…NOT high on my list of things to do.

Now that I have this blog back, I’m hoping to regain at least a bit of my old readership (hard to do when I’ve lost ALL my files, and the address is slightly different), and maybe not lose my hosting account again.

Sheesh, you would think they could’ve been like “We are deleting your stupid crappy blog in ten minutes) and then at least I could’ve ran a decent backup.

Stupid, the world is so stupid.

Anyway,  cheers to the first day of spring break (at my weird school at least), and if you’re here, please bookmark or subscribe or otherwise continue reading! There will be more interesting things here soon, I promise.